Saturday, July 23, 2011

Jeld-Wen: "Reliability for Real Life"? Or "Torment in a Hot Place"?

No doubt about it, some windows in our 1939 house needed replacement. My friend, professional contractor Mike, took a look and said, "Let's head to Home Depot and order you some new ones."

Mike is the kind of guy who moves fast. I am not. I sometimes immerse myself in research for days, weeks, or even years before pulling the trigger on a big purchase like windows. But I've always been inspired by Mike's "Git 'er done" mentality and tried to go with the flow. We walked right into Home Depot, looked at some sample windows, and decided to go with the Tradition Plus double-hung clad windows from Jeld-Wen, complete with tilt-in cleaning and what I'll call "snap-in grilles" to preserve the traditional look of our home.

How many times since then have I wish I'd shopped around a little more.

After the windows arrived, Mike installed them, and–from the moment he showed them to me–he said the "snap-in" grilles gave him trouble. I thought maybe he had just rushed things, or failed to read the directions. But over time I found his skepticism was well-founded.

As the years passed, I found that the main tradition I came to associate with my Tradition Plus windows was dreading my interactions with them.

From the start, it was more than just the windows grilles that caused headaches.

For example, the upper sash can be lowered but is always difficult to raise. Specifically: After you pull the upper sash downward, then attempt to raise it back up, one or both of the small "lifting clips" (not the actual name) in the "window edge channel" (again, not the official "window guy" name), that are apparently intended to hold the sash in a desired position when it's lowered (or raised, in the case of the lower sash), simply don't move with the sash--they are "stuck" in the spot where they were when the window was lowered, and they're not going anywhere even though you lifted the sash and they're supposed to slide up with it and hold it up.

Usually it's just one lifting clip, but the one that moved up with the window--which is attached to some sort of string that provides upward force for the window--doesn't have sufficient holding power by itself to keep the window up by itself, so the sash lists to one side in the window frame, instead of snugging up tightly to the top of the frame.

Through experimentation, I found that pushing the bottom of the top window sash outward in the direction of the outside house wall–hard–while lifting the window up, would somehow "grab" the lifting clips and force them to make the upward journey with the bottom of the window. This, however, is not easy, because–to apply sufficient outward pressure–you basically have to lift the bottom sash up a few inches and tilt it in, and then balance that leaning bottom sash against your chest or belly (or have someone hold it for you) while you push hard against the bottom of the top sash while sliding it up. Quite a workout!

But the truth is that even this annoyance was small–and surmountable through proper technique–compared to the Tradition Plus's diabolical snap-in (aka: "pin in / fall out") window grilles.

As the video below shows, the real problem with the TP window grille is its inherently poor design. The following factors all add up to make a reliable fit of the window grilles in this window an impossibility:
  1. The clear plastic piece, with the point of a stick pin molded in the end of it, enters the trim around the window sash's frame (Sorry, all you window experts in the audience--I don't have all the exact terms here) at a point where that trim is sloped "uphill" (relative to the surface of the glass), and the pin therefore wants to slide "up the hill."
  2. By the time the pin reaches the top of the "hill" referred to in the previous step (and hits the tiny ridge at the top of that hill), it can't go very far in, because the clear plastic piece holding the pin has hit its maximum travel position and its plastic body has hit the trim itself. In other words, the pin is just barely long enough to penetrate the ridge at the "top" (again, relative to the surface of the glass) of that sloped trim edge.
  3. The channel cut into the end of each stick that makes up the grille is too wide for the plastic-with-pin piece that slides in it. This makes it loose and wobbly even if you've forced the pin into the trim as "low on the hill" as possible. Which is difficult, because:
  4. The pin itself is so thick and bulky that it's difficult to push into wood, even if you could overcome the factors conspiring against you as listed above.
I have enjoyed the tilt-in feature of the Jeld-Wens for ease of window cleaning, but with each grille remove/replace cycle, the grilles seemed to fit worse and fall out more easily. I have pushed, I have prodded, I applied heavy-duty elbow grease to make the pins holding the grilles stay in, but nothing has worked. Some days I come home and find that one of the grilles on the lower sash had simply fallen out on the window stoop, and has only been saved from a trip all the way to the floor by the cafe curtains.

After five years of cursing the darkness of Jeld-Wen's poor entry-level grille design, I decided to take action and contact their customer support department. A polite gentleman, though defensive about the quality of these grilles, sent me a sample of an upgraded style of "full-frame" grilles that truly do snap in. And from the moment I took it out of the packaging and snapped it in, I knew my Jeld-Wen entry-level grille nightmare was nearly over. I plan to someday have these upgraded grilles in every window. And then we can start talking about why the top sash randomly falls down, or lists to one side because those "lifting clips" don't work reliably.

A picture is worth a thousand words, so perhaps a moving picture of Jeld-Wen's "window grilles from the place of eternal torment" will give you pause before you ever order windows without the top-of-the-line snap-in grille option that's offered.

I am sharing this video with the customer support folks I talked to at Jeld-Wen--who politely sent me a sample version of an upgraded window grille which can also be seen in the video. These better grilles are not cheap, and I am hoping Jeld-Wen will see the value in providing some adjustment in price for the remaining replacement grilles, based on what I already paid for the original, flimsy, fall-out grilles.

At this time, the video is hosted as an unlisted video on YouTube. Jeld-Wen's response will write the final chapter of this story on my blog.

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Hot Medical Chat: $11 a Minute!

Billing Manager
Shawnee Mission Physicians Group
Georgetown Family Care
7301 Frontage Road, Suite 100
Shawnee Mission, KS  66204

July 21, 2011

Dear Shawnee Mission Physicians Group:

I recently received a bill from your Chicago-based medical billing service for the amount of $88.13 for the June 7 consultation I had with Dr. Buss.

Let’s set aside for a moment the fantasical retail price of $173 mentioned on the bill, as well as the existence of the equally made-up $60 “discount” by which being covered by Cigna health plan supposedly lowers that literally incredible starting price that no one actually pays. That still means my ten-minute chat with Dr. Buss now has me on the hook for my original co-pay of $25 PLUS an additional $88.13!

I understand that running a medical facility in a country with the “best healthcare system in the world” (for now, at least) is not cheap. I realize you have expenses to cover, utilities, insurance, salaries, etc. I know there are non-paying patients you still have to cover, that those of us who have money and insurance are ultimately subsidizing. I appreciate the education, experience, and personalized care that Dr. Buss and your other physicians provide. But $113 for ten minutes of talk? Wow!

We all know that the costs of healthcare in the US—thanks to the removal of market forces that once directly connected consumers and suppliers of such services, and the domination of payment by third-party payers—have become completely unmoored from reality. But retailing a ten-minute consultation for $173 and sticking the patient with $113 of that amount enters us all into a new realm of out-of-touch medical pricing and breathtakingly audacious opportunism.

I am not writing because I don’t have the money or can’t pay the bill. I am writing because I want to send a small but direct message to those I encounter in the medical supply chain that some of us won’t simply roll over and accept having to pay ridiculous amounts like this. And I want to urge those of you who are members of both the medical management and physician communities to take whatever steps you can to reform the system along market-based, consumer-driven lines outlined by the Cato Institute, rather than the top-down control-and-command socialized-bureaucracy model we are surely as a nation slipping into.

We are a family that pays its bills, recognizes the cost of receiving first-class service, and wants those we do business with to prosper. We don’t go around expecting freebies. But we do watch our spending and didn’t get to a position of modest financial security by throwing our money away. The additional $88 you are requesting for my ten-minute office visit represents a week of groceries for our family, and I’m not going to simply write a check like that without reminding you that behind your charts and tables and spreadsheets of billing formulas are real people—not just faceless bureaucrats in an insurance company or a government reimbursement office.

I am willing to send you a check for an additional $25, bringing the total payment for my ten-minute visit to $50. If you insist on collecting the other $63, I guess our next encounter will be in collections—or, once we start avoiding coming in to ask the doctor about everyday concerns because of its astronomical price—the emergency room.

If you agree, I would appreciate you officially making the adjustment and sending a new invoice.

I am sharing this letter electronically with my friends and family, and it will be on my consumer advocacy blog for anyone searching the internet for “Shawnee Mission, “Shawnee Mission Physicians Group” or “Georgetown Family Care” to find. Your response (or non-response) can write the final chapter of this story however you want it to be, and I will share your response with my friends, family members, and blog readers.

Nothing about this letter should be read as dissatisfaction with the care I receive at Shawnee Mission’s facilities, or the physicians of Georgetown. But it is a means of illustrating how out of touch our third-party-payer-driven system has become not just in regard to the cost of sophisticated, expensive-to-develop pharmaceuticals and complex diagnostic procedures—but even the delivery of a simple, ten-minute consultation.

Respectfully yours,

The eValue-ator
[real name / real address]

cc: Dr. Matthew Buss

Thursday, July 14, 2011

The Amazing Color-Blending Rug

Note submitted to the Dash & Albert Rug Company website

While traveling in Maine a few months ago, we found a store that carried your beautiful cotton rugs and we picked up a 2 x 3 in a stripe pattern for our bathroom.

Yesterday, we decided to hand-wash it in cold water, according to the instruction tag, and simply getting it wet in this manner caused all the dyes to spread and the whole thing now has a dingy, monotone appearance. We might as well throw it away because it just looks awful.

Yes, the tag also states that professional cleaning is recommended, but we had no idea that simply getting it wet (a condition common to bathrooms, kitchens, and possibly entryways) would cause all the dyes to release and spread.

Unfortunately, we live in the Midwest, far from the store where we purchased this product. And, besides, we don't really feel it's the store's fault, anyway.

Although this rug is essentially ruined, we're not going to yell and scream and chew you out--We just wanted to make you aware of this problem so you can make changes to the product's dyes or product label ("Do NOT machine wash or HAND WASH!") so this doesn't happen to anyone else in the future. We realize that dyes in natural fibers often fade over time, but the suddenness and completeness of the dye release on this product was something we have never seen before.

Your designs are beautiful. We only wish the one we spent good money on was more practical for daily life.

Sincerely,

The eValue-ator